Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Miljan Zekic vs Luca Van Assche Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zekic vs Assche analysis and find out who is favored!
Miljan Zekic vs Luca Van Assche Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zekic 1 - 0 Assche
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zekic has won 49.4% of points on their second serve, while Assche has won 49.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zekic, in recent form, has won 55.16% of their opponent's second serve points, while Assche has won 51.31%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.66% and 30.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zekic has saved 48.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Assche has saved 60.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zekic has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 28/ 16), with Assche winning 48.28% (W/L 28/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zekic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 595/ 335), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Assche has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 74/ 46), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 14/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Zekic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.08% of matches (W/L 19/ 7), where as Assche has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 14/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zekic winning 1 times and Assche being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zekic winning 2 and Assche winning 1. The last match between Zekic and Assche was at the M15+H Bagnoles-de-l'Orne, 14-01-2020, First, Clay with Miljan Zekic getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zekic and Assche have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zekic winning 1 times and Assche 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zekic winning 0, and Assche 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zekic has played against opponents with an average rank of 283.73 while Assche has played against players with an average rank of 174.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zekic has won 83% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Assche has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zekic has converted 41.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Assche has converted 41.6% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
560
Rank
188
High
35
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
105
Rank
63
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
62% (632-381)
Career Total W/L
57% (136-103)
81% (13-3)
YTD W/L
48% (16-17)
$75,365
Career Prize Money
$528,240
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Miljan Zekic | Luca Van Assche |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Miljan Zekic | Luca Van Assche |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 81% (13/3) | 48% (16/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 72% (26/10) | 46% (39/46) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (182/140) | 50% (396/403) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 100% (2/0) | 53% (10/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 79% (11/3) | 45% (5/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.27 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 106 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 27 | 109 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:3 | 1:58:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 195.25 | 157.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (578/912) | 60% (1480/2474) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (386/578) | 70% (1040/1480) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (165/334) | 50% (494/994) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (51/123) | 42% (99/238) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (442/982) | 39% (1024/2634) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 36% (5/9) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (6/2) |
| Futures W/L | 81% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 85% (11/13) | 46% (13/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 50% (2/4) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 33% (5/15) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 57% (8/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (10/10) | 85% (13/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (10/0) | 15% (13/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (6/3) | 25% (20/5) |
Miljan Zekic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Adam Heinonen
Player
Miljan Zekic
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Kabeer Kapasi
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Maxim Krapivin
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexey Zakharov
Player
Miljan Zekic
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Pawel Juszczak
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-2 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Sasa Markovic
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 7-6(5) 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Attila Boros
68%
(
72 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
48%
(
51 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Miljan Zekic
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve %
75%
(
15 of
20)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
20
Total Points Won
11
|
4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Luca Van Assche Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Luca Van Assche
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
48%
(
38 of
79)
1st Serve %
39%
(
24 of
61)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
96)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Maxime Janvier
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
49%
(
57 of
117)
2
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
16
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
62 of
117)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Luca Van Assche
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Luca Van Assche
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
72%
(
87 of
121)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
56 of
87)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Zizou Bergs
69%
(
75 of
109)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Luca Van Assche
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
42
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Luca Van Assche
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Zekic Vs Assche Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Zekic are available here and Assche photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Luca Van Assche
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
